Campus Master Plan

ccp_6608_full.jpg

Story House and Parents Field, 1951. This land centered around the former Bixby Smith estate was identified as the site of a third college nearly a decade before CMC's founding.

The Intercollegiate Council Report of 1936-1937 identified land east of Pomona College on the former home and estate of Sarah Bixby Smith as the site for a proposed third college. In 1946, the land was ceded to the trustees of Claremont Men’s College to provide the beginning of the campus. Between 1946 and 1950, the CMC campus assumed its basic plan and architectural style. Twenty years earlier, the Scripps College campus had been built with equal rapidity. Yet that was the 1920s, when there was plenty of money, and the luxuriance of Gordon Kaufmann’s elegant Spanish Romanesque cloister and quadrangles exuded the charm and assurance of a well-planned, well-endowed venture at a time of flourishing architectural taste. The 1920s, in fact, represented the high-water mark of Mediterranean Revival throughout Southern California. It was a decade in which it seemed almost impossible to erect a bad public building. The 1940s, by contrast, prized efficiency and cost-effectiveness over solidity and historical reference. The very years in which the architecture of CMC was selected and its buildings constructed were years of housing crisis in Southern California and the rest of the United States. Arising in such circumstances, the architecture of CMC was characterized by a certain restraint–austerity, even–destined to remain a defining characteristic of both the College and a society eager to get on with the task of housing and servicing exuberant post-War growth.  

In an almost representative scenario, in which architecture directly expressed history and social process, CMC began its existence anchored in the romantic Craftsman past represented by Story House, so expressive of Claremont in the Progressive era, when the Group Plan was first envisioned. The wood and steel prefabricated units that followed embodied the dislocations and transformations of the wartime era. By the end of the decade, the serviceable presence of Appleby, Green, Boswell, and Wohlford Halls bore witness to the overnight actualization of CMC. In the colonnades of Pitzer Hall, the last building of the 1940s, Claremont Men’s College gestured toward an assured and prosperous future touched by the metaphor of Southern California.

cmc_bc_0045.jpg

Campus plan for Claremont Men's College by Allison and Rible.

To house students, the Los Angeles architectural firm of Allison and Rible provided a simple, straightforward design that was at once functional and in dialogue with the Monterey colonial style of old California. President Benson and the trustee building committee worked closely with Allison and Rible on every detail on what rapidly turned into a four-dormitory quadrangle. Benson understood the promotional value of this first dormitory as a prototype for campus development and, by the end of 1947, arranged a sketch of the entire projected campus to be used for fundraising. By the end of the following year, Allison and Rible had completed a campus master plan, which included a quadrangle of dormitories and a forthcoming dining hall. Benson also took an active interest in the landscaping of the campus, which was to be planted in sturdy, self-sufficient native shrubs and trees.

ccp_996_full.jpg

A view of the North Quad area of Claremont Men's College looking west across campus towards Honnold Library, circa 1952-1953.

Following a period of measured, yet sustained campus growth through the early 1950s, CMC was quickly approaching the tenth anniversary of its founding. To celebrate this milestone and to accelerate CMC into its second decade of expansion, the trustees launched an ambitious Tenth Anniversary Building Program, budgeted at $800,000. Over the next five years, nine major construction or improvement projects were successfully completed. The financing and construction, and consequent debt, once again pushed the resources of CMC to the limits. It also resulted in a level of cost-cutting that seriously curtailed building amenities–a characteristic, it must be pointed out, that was typical of much of the 1950s boom-era construction in Southern California. Despite their shortcomings, the buildings of this second decade created a campus that was more or less complete by the early 1960s, a mere fifteen years following the opening of the College. The era also saw CMC’s move away from a joint athletics program with Pomona College and Benson and the trustees embarked upon a program of land acquisition and construction to support a new three-tier program of physical education courses, intramural sports, and varsity competition. First on the agenda was the remainder of the undeveloped area east of Mills Avenue between Sixth and Ninth Streets, which Benson desired as an athletic field. Pomona owned the property, but after negotiations CMC was able to acquire the desired real estate through a series of complicated land exchanges.

Returning from a tour of East Coast colleges and universities, President Benson noted that many of the institutions had an emphasis on residential programs and desired to establish something similar at CMC. More and more CMC students preferred to live on campus; there was a noticeable shortage of dormitory space as the student body increased in size. Anticipating both present need and future expansion, the trustees approved in quick succession the construction of four new dormitories in the academic year 1959-60. While not completed until the next decade, the four new dormitories–Phillips Hall (1961), Berger Hall (1962), Benson Hall (1963), and Marks Hall (1964)–owed their construction to the building momentum of the Tenth Anniversary Building Program and established the Mid Quad residential district. CMC managed to construct fourteen major facilities between 1953 and 1964 and in a mere eighteen years since its founding, the College had created a commodious campus surrounded by landscaped playing fields.

Claremont Men's College Aerials  66-1 Print Scaled 002.jpg

The Claremont Men's College campus in 1966. Photograph by Van Webster '67.

In the 1960s, CMC attained new levels of fund-raising and development–in its physical plant, its faculty, its endowment, the size and academic achievement of its student body–through exhaustive planning and equally effective follow-through. After receiving a $5 million Ford Foundation challenge grant in 1964, which challenged the Claremont Colleges to raise $86 million over the next seven years, a joint faculty, trustee, and alumni committee drafted a twenty-page, single-spaced “Plan for Distinction: A Statement of the Case for Claremont Men’s College,” which presented the distilled institutional identity and development goals of CMC. The Plan for Distinction was also a fund-raising document calling for the raising of $7 million within three years and $13 million over the next seven years with three central goals: to raise faculty salaries, establish endowment for scholarships, and continue to develop the physical plant. As funds poured in, the expansion of the campus plant accelerated its pace and CMC doubled its physical plant in the 1960s, which included additions to and expansion of athletics facilities, as well as the construction of five new dormitories and Bauer Center.

Planning continued in tandem with construction through the 1960s, and in June 1967, the Board of Trustees established the Committee of the Future of Claremont Men’s College for long-range planning and to maintain its development momentum. Chaired by Trustee Donald McKenna, the Committee prepared a ten-year plan, which was adopted by the Board on December 9, 1968. “Long Range Plan: A Policy Statement for the Future of Claremont Men’s College” outlined a plan looking at the decade ahead with recommendations on academic, student, and fundraising policies and strategies, while stressing that CMC would continue to remain residential and emphasize close faculty-student contact.

Long Range Plan: A Policy Statement for the Future of Claremont Men's College (aka McKenna Report), 1968

Aerial View of the Claremont Colleges_Frampton_1971 November 16.jpg

An aerial view of CMC and the Claremont Colleges, November 1971.

In the academic year 1983-84, the Board of Trustees established a Master Plan Steering Committee, co-chaired by trustees Bruce Bean ‘67 and Howard Marguleas P’87. Working through six joint committees and task forces and three student committees, the Master Plan Steering Committee was charged with the examination of all aspects of the College’s programs and facilities: curriculum, faculty, research, student enrollment, student services, physical plant, finance, and financial development. Among its recommendations, the Master Plan recommended strengthening the science program conducted jointly with Scripps and Pitzer and reassessing campus buildings constructed during the first decades of campus development. While many of the academic, residential, and athletic facilities remained suitable for undergraduates and faculty, expansion and renovations would be necessary in the future. The Master Plan acknowledged that buildings constructed in the leaner early years were spartan in appearance, with some of the more recent buildings attempting to rectify the no-frills nature of early campus architecture to include more aesthetic flourishes. Campus improvements and construction of new buildings continued through the 1990s with increased landscaping emerging as an important method to enhance the austerity of the campus buildings of the 1940s. An intensive landscaping plan was destined in time to create a luxuriant camps park with the addition of new plazas and fountains.

Claremont McKenna College Master Plan, 1985-1995

In October 2008, the College’s Board of Trustees authorized the Buildings and Grounds Committee to complete a Master Plan process to guide the ongoing evolution of the campus and consider growth to accommodate up to 1,400 students. Among the Master Plan’s goals were to create a framework to guide campus improvements, enhance the appeal of the campus, steward existing campus architectural, landscape, and historical features, and assure a sustainable campus through the use of environmental best practices. Following the selection of Moore Ruble Yudell Architects and Planners, the Building Grounds and Committee initiated the Master Plan process in the spring of 2009 with the creation of the College’s Master Plan Beliefs and Principles. The purpose of the Master Plan is to create a flexible document to guide the College in making future building and site improvement decisions. The Plan was designed to adapt to a variety of factors while addressing implications of strategic, economic, and physical planning considerations. It considered long-range consequences that could preserve or foreclose options in the future. And just as campus needs, issues, and influences are ever changing, CMC’s Master Plan will continue to be a work in progress.

Claremont McKenna College Master Plan, June 2012